How does the F-16 perform against F-18 and
F-22 ?
The
Lockheed Martin F-16 Fighting Falcon is the western world’s most prolific
fighter of the last 40 years.
Even
if medium and long range air-to-air massiles, such as the AIM-7 Sparrow and the
AIM-120 AMRAAM, have been integrated in the F-16 since 1986 for the BVR
(Beyond Visual Range) engagements, the Viper was born in response to LWF (Light
Weight Fighter) program, for a small and agile fighter: the USAF needed a
small, cheap, maneuverable airplane to flank the F-15 Eagle, its air superiority
fighter, to face the small Soviet fighters, such as the MiG-21 in close combat.
Indeed,
Red and Green Flags, Tiger Meetings, and any other major western exercise
feature tons of Vipers (the universal F-16’s nickname) of all types and ages
and, almost daily, F-16 from different air forces take part to DACT (Dissimilar
Air Combat Training) sessions against the most modern fighter jets, sometimes
playing the Aggressor role.
Therefore,
understanding which are the advantages and the disadvantages of F-16 against
the modern western fighters in DACT sessions, based on pilots accounts and most
widely known fighter jets characteristics (Rules of Engagement within the
training scenario, pilots skills and other factors which may have a significant
impact on the outcome of a dogfight will be ignored), can be interesting.
According
to one of the more experienced of the U. S. Air Force Viper’s pilots,
Lieutenant Colonel Philipe “Rico” Malebranche, the F-16 can do very well
against the F-22. The F-16 is small, light and agile: although it has a lower
maximum speed and rate of climb, it has a smaller Radar Cross Section and, once
on the merge, it’s harder to spot. Furthermore, its turn rate is impressive: it
does not lose much energy in turns (unlike, for instance, a F-18 ) and can
outmaneuver the F-22 in low altitude dogfights.
However,
the toughest of the fighter jet to face in aerial combat, at least if you are
seated in an F-16, is the F-22 Raptor: “It’s not a matter of trying
to kill him, but to see how long you can survive!” as “Rico” says
WVR
engagements versus the F/A-18E/F Super Hornet can be quite challenging as
well.
The
F-16 has a higher thrust-to-weight ratio than the “Super Bug” and this is an
advantage Viper drivers can exploit in close air combat: “we can climb 3,000
feet above the F-18, then bunt over to put him in the HUD (Head Up Display) for
a gun shot” Malebranche, who has also been an exchange pilot in a U.S. Navy
Hornet Squadron, says.
However,
while it bleeds energy faster than the F-16, the “Rhino” is much better than
the Viper if the dogfight gets slow, because the Hornet handle high angles of
attack and point the nose at the opponent easier.
No comments:
Post a Comment